Good morning Dearest the miss Lyla Dearest the chair person Ladies and gentlemen First of all, I’d like to introduce our team We are from negative team My name is Feni Rusitawati as the first speaker The second speaker is Uswatun chasanah And the third speaker is Teguh Hadi P. Okay ladies and gentlemen As the negative team, of course, I disagree with the motion. However, before I give more about my argument, permit me to define the motion first. UAS as a tool of control in the era of School autonomy is still needed as long as not used as a determinant of graduation but, serves as research instrument, but maple national final test expanded. From the data obtained can be used as are commendation to the ministry of
education in education policy. Making to improve quality. From the result obtained can also rank the position of one school with another. As a result school are morally bound to remain committed to the standards made by central government. And fear of school quality rangers far between each other can be avoided. Another reason is the national final test remained necessary as a selection tool to the Pt. Therefore it is not a passing consideration. But with the three maple national final test is not representative. Should be added as needed in the Pt Ladies and gentlemen From the definition above, I conclude that no exams should not be abolished exams are the only way to know about the preparation of a student that what prepare, if exams would abolished that a student can lose remember power. Well ladies and gentlemen I think that’s an for my argument. the second speaker of our team will give you explanation in detail. Thank you very much for your attention.
education in education policy. Making to improve quality. From the result obtained can also rank the position of one school with another. As a result school are morally bound to remain committed to the standards made by central government. And fear of school quality rangers far between each other can be avoided. Another reason is the national final test remained necessary as a selection tool to the Pt. Therefore it is not a passing consideration. But with the three maple national final test is not representative. Should be added as needed in the Pt Ladies and gentlemen From the definition above, I conclude that no exams should not be abolished exams are the only way to know about the preparation of a student that what prepare, if exams would abolished that a student can lose remember power. Well ladies and gentlemen I think that’s an for my argument. the second speaker of our team will give you explanation in detail. Thank you very much for your attention.
No comments:
Post a Comment